Bradley Byrne endorses Jerry Carl in GOP runoff for his District 1 seat

https://altoday.com/archives/34803-bradley-byrne-endorses-jerry-carl-in-gop-runoff-for-his-district-1-seat

PLEASE support Mr CARL his opponent is CATALYST. A vote for CATALYST is a vote against your best interest. Baldwin County needs to pull together and vote out all CATALYST “Players”

A DECADE OF CORRUPTION

VOTE JULY 14th FIRST CONGRESSIONAL DISTRICT JERRY CARL

Read the latest Special Report!

22 Comments on "Bradley Byrne endorses Jerry Carl in GOP runoff for his District 1 seat"

  1. So, Bradley Byrne is endorsing Jerry Carl. I am happy to hear this.
    If Carl wins then this will be a blow to the crooked politics of Catalyst. It will show the politicians that Catalyst will be a liability in associating with Catalyst.

  2. The more I hear about Jerry Carl the more I like him.
    Go Jerry Carl!
    You can beat the Catalysts! Just ask Billie Jo, Karin Wilson, Harry D’Olive, and the growing numbers of those that are tired of the good ole boy politics.

  3. Carl is a good guy. I met him and he doesn’t display his faith as a campaign prop
    I would vote a Democrat in before I would vote for Hightower

  4. Send Catalyst a message
    Vote for Carl

  5. Hightower’s a commie.
    Voting Carl for my Pappy.

    • Denizen of Daphne | June 15, 2020 at 7:48 pm | Reply

      Trent, it’s not so much that he might be a commie, but it is for certain that he is a Catalyst.
      That is why I will not vote for anyone associated with this outfit
      If Sheriff Mack uses Catalyst again then he will not get my vote. I liked Kant but Kant used Catalyst in 2016. I was so disappointed in him. I have now seen what this group does and it is control their “clients.”

  6. I was thinking about voting for Carl, then he is endorsed by Ripp. Guess I can’t support him now!

    • Ha ha. So if you dislike Ripp so much then why did you bother to read Ripp’s post
      I know why and it is because more and more people read the Ripp Report.
      Catalyst is getting real nervous because Ripp and the lawyer that Ripp does the podcast with are calling out the antics Catalyst has done
      So go ahead and vote contrarian. I guess you are going to vote against Karin as well. That is your right. It is also our right to vote for Karin and Carl as we vote against the Catalyst Maxine
      You Catalysts are being exposed. It is going to take more than fish fries to explain yourselves

  7. Carl has it in the bag.
    Lowtower wears a mask.

    • Lowtower is a Catalyst. He really does NOT care about the people he claims wishes to “represent.” He just wants to get in with Catalyst and make money off of over developing, grab his money and leave. This is how developers work. They are like locusts coming in, pillaging the area, and moving off to another area.
      They are the modern equivalent of marauding invaders.

  8. What the city needs is a man in charge.
    A new face.
    He’s coming.
    A neutral candidate capable of building a consensus.

    • Oh Jack4fh, I see. Is this “Nuetral” person of whom you refer, is he going to use Catalyst? Before you answer that, we can tell by the 4×4 pvc signs, the expenditure reports, who this person associates with, how he makes his living, and how he answers questions. If there is one whiff that this person has the filthy stink of Catalyst then he is doomed. We took down Kant and his crooked vote-fixing father in law so we can surely take down a lightweight
      So go ahead and impress us

    • Can’t stop laughing | June 16, 2020 at 3:14 pm | Reply

      Ha ha ha ha ha
      Did you really mean man in charge?
      Aha haha haha
      Let’s see how that goes across the women voters in Fairhope
      I have this picture of a LEAD BALLOON in my mind that I cannot get out of my head and I cannot stop laughing at your remark
      Ha ha ha ha ha
      Man in charge – really?
      Ha ha ha ha
      Are there really sexists still around that can read and write?

    • And who is this man? Is it Jack? Is it you?
      Is it me?

    • A Man in charge that can build consensus? Consensus with who? The council who is owned by the Corte or the people who have to put up with them ruining our town?
      But I see your point that it has to be a man. I like that. Only a man can do it
      Do you talk that way in front of your wife if you still have one?

    • We can’t wait to see which FAUX candidate CATALYST will run, it is not going to work this time

      • We all need to keep being vigilant on Catalyst and its sneaky moves. Just watching this group’s movement in Bay Minette, Daphne, Spanish Fort, and Fairhope let’s me know they are getting on the defense
        Catalyst, whether it be called Elliot, Haygood, and Stacy, or you call it the “Machine” or you call it after the late Lyn Stacey, it is still a bunch of politicians that were bought by real estate developers so these developers can do what they please in the county. These same politicians stick together and hold parties for themselves and do not care about the people they were elected to serve. Of course you will see them in the larger churches in the area so they can put their phony Christianity on display. This plays well to the voters and Catalysts know this
        You politicians who are owned by Catalyst better be prepared to explain why you continue to be owned by Catalyst

    • Is Jack4fairhopia serious? | June 16, 2020 at 3:59 pm | Reply

      Jack4fairhopia, you really got to put down the crack pipe and think about what you just said. I would not be surprised if the female voters automatically will see any male candidate as your man who will build a consensus.
      I wonder if you are just trolling this site trying to get an emotional arousal or if you really are that obtuse.

    • A Faux Candidate

  9. A man
    He’s coming
    Yeah, so is Christmas

  10. We DON’T need another WHITE MAN on the council or as mayor!

  11. Carl will win and endorse Karin Wilson.
    Lowtower will disappear like the jubilees.

Leave a comment

Your email address will not be published. Email not required to submit comment